ch34

Tribal societies in India before British rule were diverse, each with unique customs, traditions, and economic practices. Their lives were deeply intertwined with forests and natural resources.

Key Livelihood Patterns

• Jhum Cultivators (Shifting Cultivators):
• Found in hilly and forested tracts of North-East and Central India.
• Process:

1. Cut down tree-tops to allow sunlight to reach the ground.
2. Burnt vegetation on the land to clear it for cultivation.
3. Spread the ash (containing potash) to fertilise the soil.
4. Used hoes to scratch the soil, not ploughs, to prepare for sowing.
5. Cultivated for a few years, then moved to a new plot (fallow land).

• Characteristics:
• Allowed land to recover its fertility naturally.
• Sustainable practice in areas with low population density.
• Provided a variety of produce (food, fuel, fodder).

• Hunters and Gatherers:
• Many tribal groups survived by hunting animals and gathering forest produce.
• Examples:
• Khonds of Odisha: Hunted collectively, ate forest fruits and roots, cooked with Sal and Mahua oil, used forest herbs for medicine, sold forest produce to local markets.
• Baigas of Central India: Refused to work for others, considered themselves 'people of the forest', lived solely on forest produce.
• Interdependence: Often exchanged forest produce for essential goods like salt, rice, and cloth with local traders/moneylenders.

• Pastoralists (Herding Animals):
• Many tribes were pastoralists, moving with their herds of cattle, sheep, goats, and camels according to seasonal changes.
• Examples:
• Van Gujjars of Punjab Hills and Labadias of Andhra Pradesh: Cattle herders.
• Gaddis of Kulu: Shepherds.
• Bakarwals of Kashmir: Goat herders.
• Seasonal Migration: Followed a pattern of moving to different pastures based on the availability of grass and water.

• Settled Cultivators:
• Some tribal groups began to settle down and cultivate land in one place.
• Examples:
• Mundas of Chota Nagpur.
• Gonds and Santhals.
• Land Ownership: Often held land as a clan, with all members having rights to the land. Some individuals might have more power than others.
• Developed plough cultivation and gradually gained rights over their land.
• Considered 'more civilised' by the British compared to jhum cultivators or hunters/gatherers.

The 'Golden Age' Vision

• Tribal communities often held a vision of a 'Golden Age' in the past.
• This was a time when they believed they lived freely, without the interference of outsiders (Dikus), and had abundant access to forest resources.
• This vision fueled many of their resistance movements against British rule and Dikus.

The arrival of the British brought significant changes and disruptions to tribal life, leading to widespread discontent and resistance.

Impact on Tribal Chiefs

• Before British: Tribal chiefs were powerful, had economic power, administered their territories, and managed their own police.
• Under British:
• Lost much of their administrative power.
• Forced to follow British laws.
• Had to pay tribute to the British.
• Retained only their land titles over a cluster of villages, but lost their authority.
• Became vassals of the British, losing their traditional independence.

Impact on Shifting Cultivators

• British View: Considered shifting cultivation 'wasteful and harmful' for forests and difficult to control/tax.
• British Policy: Wanted settled cultivators for easier administration, revenue collection, and control.
• Consequences:
• Forced jhum cultivators to settle down.
• Led to frequent protests and rebellions (e.g., Santhals, Baigas).
• Disrupted traditional livelihoods and food security.
• When forced to settle, they often failed to produce enough, leading to poverty.

The Role of Dikus (Outsiders)

• Definition: 'Dikus' referred to outsiders like moneylenders, traders, contractors, and British officials.
• Exploitation:
• Moneylenders: Lent money at exorbitant interest rates, trapping tribals in debt cycles. Often seized tribal land when loans couldn't be repaid.
• Traders: Bought forest produce at very low prices and sold essential goods at high prices, leading to unequal exchange.
• Contractors: Hired tribals for low wages for railway construction, road building, etc., often under coercive conditions.
• Missionaries: Tried to convert tribals to Christianity, often seen as an attack on their culture.
• Perception: Tribals saw Dikus as the root cause of their misery, leading to loss of land, debt, and cultural erosion.

Impact of British Land Revenue Policies

• British introduced fixed land revenue assessments.
• Tribals, especially settled ones, found it difficult to pay these taxes, often leading to loss of land to moneylenders or the state.
• Disrupted traditional communal land ownership patterns.

The British colonial government enacted various forest laws that profoundly impacted tribal communities, who depended heavily on forests for their survival.

Reasons for British Forest Laws

• Commercial Exploitation: British wanted to control forests for timber (especially for shipbuilding and railway sleepers).
• Revenue Generation: Forests were seen as a source of revenue.
• Control over Shifting Cultivation: To stop shifting cultivation, which they considered unproductive and a fire hazard.

Key Features of Forest Laws

• Forest Act of 1865 (and subsequent amendments):
• Declared forests as state property.
• Categorised forests into 'Reserved Forests', 'Protected Forests', and 'Village Forests'.
• Reserved Forests: Most valuable forests, where tribals were completely forbidden to enter or practice jhum cultivation, hunt, or collect forest produce.
• Protected Forests: Some traditional rights allowed but restricted.
• Creation of Forest Departments: To manage and control forests.

Impact on Tribal Life

• Loss of Livelihood: Tribals were displaced from their ancestral lands and denied access to forests, which were their primary source of food, fuel, fodder, and medicine.
• Forced Labour: When tribals were prevented from entering forests, the Forest Department faced a problem of finding cheap labour to cut trees and transport timber. They often forced tribals to work for them for very low wages.
• Starvation and Poverty: Loss of access to forest produce led to famines and increased poverty.
• Cultural Disruption: Forest laws interfered with tribal customs, rituals, and way of life, which were deeply connected to the forest.
• Migration: Many tribals were forced to migrate to distant places like tea plantations of Assam or coal mines of Jharkhand to find work, often under harsh conditions and exploitative contracts.

Reactions to Forest Laws

• Tribals resisted these laws through various means, including open rebellion.
• They often defied the laws, continuing to enter forests and practice their traditional activities.
• The British sometimes had to make concessions, allowing tribals to practice shifting cultivation in small patches in exchange for providing labour to the Forest Department.

The entry of traders and moneylenders into tribal areas, facilitated by British policies, created a new layer of exploitation.

Traders

• Demand for Forest Produce: British demand for forest products like silk cocoons, lac, and timber increased.
• Exploitative Practices: Traders would visit tribal areas, offering small advances to tribals for their produce.
• Example: Silk Growers: Santhals of Hazaribagh reared cocoons. Traders (middlemen) bought cocoons for Rs 3-4 per thousand and sold them in Burdwan or Gaya for Rs 5000. This huge profit margin left the tribal silk growers with very little.
• Unequal Exchange: Tribals often sold their goods at very low prices and bought necessities (salt, oil, cloth) at inflated prices.

Moneylenders

• Debt Trap: Moneylenders provided loans to tribals, often for paying taxes, buying necessities, or during lean seasons.
• High Interest Rates: Charged exorbitant interest rates, sometimes as high as 100% or more.
• Land Seizure: When tribals failed to repay loans, moneylenders often seized their land or forced them into bonded labour.
• Loss of Control: The debt cycle led to a gradual loss of tribal land and economic independence.

Consequences for Tribals

• Impoverishment: The combined effect of exploitative trade and usurious lending led to extreme poverty and destitution.
• Loss of Land: Many tribals became landless labourers on their own ancestral lands.
• Resentment: Deep resentment against Dikus (traders and moneylenders) grew, often leading to violent outbreaks.

The cumulative effect of British policies, forest laws, and exploitation by Dikus led to numerous tribal uprisings across India.

Common Causes of Rebellions

• Loss of traditional land rights.
• Disruption of traditional livelihoods (e.g., shifting cultivation).
• Exploitation by moneylenders and traders.
• Imposition of British laws and administration.
• Interference in religious and cultural practices.
• Forced labour and low wages.

Major Tribal Rebellions

• Kol Rebellion (1831-32):
• Region: Chota Nagpur.
• Causes: Land policies, exploitation by outsiders.
• Santhal Rebellion (1855-56):
• Region: Santhal Parganas (present-day Jharkhand).
• Leaders: Sidhu and Kanhu Murmu.
• Causes: Loss of land, exploitation by moneylenders and zamindars, British revenue policies.
• Nature: A violent uprising against Dikus and British authority, aiming to create an independent Santhal state.
• Outcome: Suppressed by the British with heavy casualties, but led to the creation of the Santhal Parganas Tenancy Act, offering some protection.
• Koya Rebellion (1879-80):
• Region: Rampa region of Andhra Pradesh.
• Leader: Alluri Sitarama Raju (later, in early 20th century, another Koya rebellion).
• Causes: Forest laws, exploitation.
• Bastar Rebellion (1910):
• Region: Bastar (present-day Chhattisgarh).
• Causes: Reservation of forests, displacement.
• Warli Revolt (1945):
• Region: Maharashtra.
• Causes: Bonded labour, land issues.

Characteristics of Tribal Rebellions

• Often led by charismatic leaders who claimed divine inspiration.
• Aimed at expelling Dikus and restoring a 'Golden Age'.
• Used traditional weapons and guerrilla warfare tactics.
• Brutally suppressed by the British, but left a lasting legacy of resistance.

The Munda Rebellion, led by Birsa Munda, was one of the most significant tribal movements against British rule and Diku exploitation.

Birsa Munda: The Leader

• Birth: Born in 1870s in a poor Munda family in Chota Nagpur.
• Early Life: Grew up hearing tales of Munda uprisings and the 'Golden Age' of his ancestors. Influenced by missionaries and Vaishnav preachers.
• Vision: Proclaimed himself a divine messenger, claiming to have miraculous healing powers and the ability to save his people from Dikus and restore their kingdom.
• Message: Urged Mundas to:
• Give up drinking liquor.
• Clean their villages.
• Stop believing in witchcraft and sorcery.
• Return to their traditional Munda religion.
• Stop paying rent to landlords.
• Fight against Dikus and the British.

The Munda Rebellion (Ulgulan - The Great Tumult)

• Period: Primarily 1895-1900.
• Causes:
• British Land Policies: Disrupted the traditional 'khuntkatti' (joint landholding) system of the Mundas, replacing it with individual land ownership and allowing Dikus to acquire land.
• Exploitation by Moneylenders and Landlords: Loss of land and debt.
• Missionary Activities: Seen as an attack on Munda culture and religion.
• Forest Laws: Restricted access to forests.
• Objectives:
• To establish a Munda Raj (kingdom).
• To drive out missionaries, moneylenders, Hindu landlords, and the government.
• To restore the 'Golden Age' where Mundas lived freely and cultivated their land.
• Course of the Movement:
• Birsa toured villages, gathering support.
• Attacked police stations, churches, and properties of moneylenders and zamindars.
• Hoisted the white flag as a symbol of Birsa Raj.
• Suppression:
• Birsa was arrested in 1895 and released in 1897.
• He restarted the movement, but was re-arrested in 1900.
• Died in jail in 1900, reportedly due to cholera.
• The movement eventually faded after his death.

Significance of the Munda Rebellion

• Forced the British to introduce the Chota Nagpur Tenancy Act of 1908.
• This Act protected tribal land from being easily taken away by Dikus.
• Demonstrated the capacity of tribal people to protest against injustice.
• Birsa Munda became a legendary figure, a symbol of tribal resistance and aspiration for self-rule.
• Inspired future tribal movements and nationalist struggles.